Concept Map Scoring guide |
|
Criteria |
(10-8 pts) |
Good
(7-5 pts) |
Fair
(4-2 pts) |
Needs Improvement (1- pt) |
Your Score |
Hierarchy |
Map shows sufficient levels of hierarchy with no
confusion of levels. |
Map shows most levels of hierarchy with little
confusion of the levels. |
Map shows some levels but confusion of concepts
and where they belong. |
Map shows no distinct hierarchy. |
|
Accuracy |
All concepts are understood and used
accurately. |
Map shows main concept understanding with few
mistakes of terms. |
Some misconception in concepts and grouping of
concepts. |
Concepts are used inaccurately and map indicates
misunderstanding of terms and concepts. |
|
Relationships and Concepts |
All terms are correct with accurate linking
words. All arrows are present and showing how
the concepts are linked. Cross-links are
present. |
Map gets most of the correct linking words and
terms. Most of the concepts are linked correctly
by arrows. Very few cross-links are present. |
Map shows limited understanding of concepts, and
some linking words are not appropriate. |
Map has incorrect arrows connecting concepts.
Concepts are not linked appropriately, and no
cross-links are present. |
|
Presentation and Legibility |
Map is presented with no errors in spelling and
grammar. The map is legible and neat. |
The map has very few errors in spelling and
grammar. The map is legible. |
The map is legible but contains some spelling
and grammar errors. |
The map is sloppy and illegible. There are many
spelling and grammar errors. |
|
This scoring guide was adopted
and modified from previous work presented in Teacher ED 435, and can be accessed
at:
https://education.umkc.edu/scienceeducation/435/CM/Assessment/concept%20maps/studentmaps/studentgrades.htm